SMOG Index Calculator
Instantly measure your text's comprehension level using the SMOG Index (Simple Measure of Gobbledygook). Trusted by healthcare professionals worldwide, SMOG provides accurate readability assessment by analyzing polysyllabic words and sentence structures, making it particularly effective for medical and professional content.
Understanding the SMOG Index
What is the SMOG Index?
The SMOG Index (Simple Measure of Gobbledygook) is a readability formula that estimates the years of education a person needs to fully comprehend a piece of writing. Created by G. Harry McLaughlin in 1969, it revolutionized readability assessment by focusing on complete comprehension rather than partial understanding, making it particularly valuable for healthcare and technical documentation.
Unlike other readability metrics that test for 50-75% comprehension, SMOG is unique in that it predicts the education level needed for 100% comprehension of a text. This higher standard makes it especially suitable for healthcare materials and technical documentation where complete understanding is crucial.
Origins and Development
McLaughlin developed SMOG while working as a clinical psychologist, after earlier experience as a journalist at the Mirror newspaper in London. His background in both communications and psychology led him to create a formula that was both scientifically valid and remarkably simple to use. The name "SMOG" was chosen as a tribute to Robert Gunning's FOG Index and as a nod to McLaughlin's London origins.
When first published in the Journal of Reading, the formula's simplicity caused some skepticism - one statistician thought it was a "put on." However, extensive validation studies, particularly in healthcare communications, have proven SMOG to be one of the most accurate readability measures available.
How SMOG Stands Apart
What makes SMOG unique is its focus on polysyllabic words (words with three or more syllables) and its emphasis on complete comprehension. Key distinguishing features include:
- Measures 100% comprehension rather than partial understanding
- Uses a 30-sentence sampling method for more reliable results
- Provides consistent results across different types of content
- Validated specifically for healthcare materials
- Simple enough to calculate manually, yet precise enough for professional use
Modern Applications
Today, SMOG is widely used across various fields, with particular prominence in healthcare communications. Medical professionals and institutions rely on SMOG to ensure patient education materials are accessible to their intended audience. The formula's accuracy and focus on complete comprehension make it the preferred choice for materials where reader understanding is critical, such as medical instructions, consent forms, and public health information.
Healthcare Standard
A 2010 study in the Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh established SMOG as the preferred measure for evaluating healthcare materials, noting its superior accuracy compared to other readability formulas. This recommendation has made SMOG the gold standard for medical communication accessibility.
The SMOG Formula Explained
The complete mathematical formula for maximum accuracy
Simplified Version for Quick Calculations:
For 30-sentence samples, this approximation gives reliable results
Understanding the Formula
McLaughlin developed two versions of the SMOG formula: a precise mathematical equation for maximum accuracy, and a simplified version for practical use. The complete formula accounts for variations in sample length, while the simplified version assumes a standard 30-sentence sample.
Complete Formula Method
The complete formula provides maximum accuracy and can be used for any text length:
- Count the total number of sentences in the text
- Count all polysyllabic words (words with 3+ syllables)
- Apply the formula: 1.043 × √(polysyllabic words × (30/sentences)) + 3.1291
Simplified Method
For quick manual calculations with 30-sentence samples:
- Select exactly 30 sentences (10 from beginning, middle, and end)
- Count polysyllabic words in these sentences
- Take the square root of the count
- Add 3 to get the approximate grade level
This simplified version was specifically designed for 30-sentence samples and has been validated to provide reliable results for most purposes.
Important Counting Rules
- A sentence is any string of words ending with a period, question mark, or exclamation point
- Count proper nouns if they have three or more syllables
- Count repetitions of polysyllabic words each time they appear
- Hyphenated words count as a single word
- Numbers should be pronounced to determine syllable count
Quick Example
Consider this sample calculation:
- Sample text: 30 sentences selected
- Polysyllabic word count: 35 words
- Nearest perfect square: 36
- Square root of 36: 6
- Add 3 to get final grade level: 9
- Result: Text requires a 9th-grade reading level
This simple example shows how SMOG can quickly assess text difficulty while maintaining accuracy. For precise calculations, use our calculator above.
SMOG Grade Level Scale
The SMOG grade corresponds to the U.S. school grade level required for complete comprehension. Remember that SMOG is calibrated for 100% comprehension, so its scores tend to be 1-2 grades higher than other readability formulas that test for only partial understanding.
| SMOG Score | Grade Level | Reader Age | Education Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19+ | Post-graduate | 24+ | Doctoral level |
| 17-18 | Graduate Level | 22-23 | Master's level |
| 13-16 | College Level | 18-21 | University education |
| 12 | Twelfth Grade | 17-18 | High school senior |
| 11 | Eleventh Grade | 16-17 | High school junior |
| 10 | Tenth Grade | 15-16 | High school sophomore |
| 9 | Ninth Grade | 14-15 | High school freshman |
| 8 | Eighth Grade | 13-14 | Middle school |
| 7 | Seventh Grade | 12-13 | Middle school |
| 6 | Sixth Grade | 11-12 | Middle school |
| 5 | Fifth Grade | 10-11 | Elementary school |
Interpreting SMOG Scores
SMOG scores typically run 1-2 grades higher than other readability formulas because they indicate the level needed for 100% comprehension. When selecting your target grade level, consider both your audience and the importance of complete understanding.
Healthcare Materials
Aim for grades 6-8 to ensure accessibility while maintaining accuracy. Patient education materials should never exceed grade 10 unless intended for medical professionals.
General Public Content
Target grades 7-9 for general audience materials. This range ensures accessibility while allowing for some complexity in the subject matter.
Technical Documentation
Grades 11-14 are acceptable for technical content, reflecting the specialized vocabulary while maintaining clarity in sentence structure.
Academic Writing
Grades 13-16 are typical for academic content, accommodating complex concepts and specialized terminology common in scholarly work.
📝 Healthcare Writing Tip
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommends that patient materials be written at or below the 7th-grade level. When using SMOG, aim for a score of 7-8, as its higher standard ensures patients will fully comprehend critical health information.
SMOG Index vs Other Readability Metrics
While several readability formulas exist, SMOG offers unique advantages, particularly for content where complete comprehension is crucial. Here's how it compares to other popular metrics:
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level
Tests for 75% comprehension rather than SMOG's 100%. While widely used, studies have shown it can underestimate reading difficulty, particularly in healthcare materials. SMOG typically scores 1-2 grades higher due to its higher comprehension standard.
Gunning Fog Index
Like SMOG, considers polysyllabic words, but uses different sampling methods and aims for 90% comprehension. SMOG simplified and improved upon Fog's approach, leading to more consistent results across different types of content.
Coleman-Liau Index
Uses character count instead of syllables, making it easier to automate but less accurate for specialized vocabulary. SMOG's focus on polysyllabic words makes it more sensitive to technical and medical terminology.
Automated Readability Index
Uses character and word counts rather than syllables. While this makes it computationally simpler, SMOG's syllable-based approach has been shown to be more accurate for assessing comprehension, especially in technical content.
Key SMOG Advantages
- • Tests for complete (100%) comprehension
- • Validated specifically for healthcare materials
- • More accurate with technical and specialized vocabulary
- • Offers both precise and simplified calculation methods
- • Higher correlation with reading comprehension tests
Healthcare Applications
SMOG has emerged as the preferred readability measure for healthcare materials, with extensive research validating its effectiveness in medical communications. Its focus on complete comprehension makes it particularly valuable for health-related content where patient understanding is crucial.
Research Validation
A 2010 study by the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh established SMOG as the gold standard for evaluating healthcare materials. The research found that other readability formulas, including Flesch-Kincaid, significantly underestimated reading difficulty of medical content, making SMOG the more reliable choice for ensuring patient comprehension.
Current Healthcare Challenges
Research has shown that:
- 34% of US adults have only basic or below basic reading literacy
- This increases to 61% in the over-65 age group
- Inadequate health literacy is particularly common among older patients
- Poor health literacy is associated with poor treatment compliance and disease knowledge
SMOG's Healthcare Advantages
- • Tests for 100% comprehension, essential for medical instructions
- • More accurate with technical medical terminology
- • Provides consistent results across different types of health content
- • Validated specifically for online health information
- • Better suited for evaluating patient education materials
Recommendations for Healthcare Content
Based on research findings, healthcare materials should:
- Be written at or below the 6th-grade level (US National Work Group on Literacy and Health recommendation)
- Undergo regular SMOG assessment to ensure accessibility
- Consider the higher prevalence of limited literacy among older adults
- Be revised if SMOG scores indicate reading levels above recommendations
Key Research Finding
The Edinburgh study found that the Flesch-Kincaid formula significantly underestimated reading difficulty compared to SMOG (p<0.0001), with a mean underestimation of 2.52 grades. This validates SMOG as a more reliable tool for ensuring healthcare content is truly accessible to patients.
Tips for Improving Your SMOG Score
Vocabulary Selection
- • Replace complex words with simpler alternatives
- • Break down compound terms when possible
- • Use common words over technical jargon
- • Define necessary technical terms clearly
Sentence Structure
- • Keep sentences under 20 words
- • Use active voice whenever possible
- • One main idea per sentence
- • Break complex ideas into multiple sentences
Content Organization
- • Use clear headings and subheadings
- • Present information in logical order
- • Include bullet points for key information
- • Provide examples for complex concepts
Healthcare Writing
- • Use lay terms for medical concepts
- • Include visual aids when possible
- • Explain acronyms on first use
- • Break down complex procedures into steps
Common Polysyllabic Words and Alternatives
Instead of:
- • "approximately" → "about"
- • "immediately" → "now"
- • "medications" → "drugs"
- • "sufficient" → "enough"
- • "facilitate" → "help"
Replace with:
- • "numerous" → "many"
- • "utilize" → "use"
- • "demonstrate" → "show"
- • "terminate" → "end"
- • "additional" → "more"
Remember:
The goal isn't always to achieve the lowest possible SMOG score. Instead, aim for a score that matches your target audience's reading level while maintaining the accuracy and professionalism your content requires. For healthcare materials, focus on clarity and accuracy over simplification.
Ready to Analyze Your Text?
Get instant readability insights with Gorby's comprehensive text analysis tools, including SMOG Index calculations.
Try our text analyzer to see all readability scores, including SMOG Index, in one place. Get instant feedback on readability, receive writing suggestions, and ensure your content meets required communication standards.
Resources and References
Original SMOG Formula Paper
McLaughlin, G. Harry. "SMOG Grading - A New Readability Formula" (1969). Journal of Reading, 12(8), 639-646. This foundational paper introduces the SMOG formula and explains its development and validation.
Read the paperA Readability Assessment of Online Parkinson's Disease Information
Fitzsimmons, P., Michael, B., Hulley, J., & Scott, G. (2010). Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 40(4), 292-296. This influential study established SMOG as the "gold standard" for evaluating healthcare materials.
View on PubMedSMOG on Wikipedia
A comprehensive overview of the SMOG Index, including its history, applications, and validation studies. The article provides additional context about the formula's development and adoption in various fields.
Read more
More Readability Tools
All Readability Metrics
Overview of all readability formulas and tools
Automated Readability Index (ARI)
Calculate grade level based on character count
Coleman-Liau Index
Analyze text complexity using characters per word
Dale-Chall Readability
Evaluate readability using word familiarity
Flesch Reading Ease
Measure text readability on a 100-point scale
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level
Convert text complexity to U.S. grade levels
Gunning Fog Index
Measure text complexity using sentence length and word difficulty
Spache Readability Formula
Evaluate early reading materials using familiar word lists
