Gunning Fog Index Calculator

Instantly measure your text's grade level using the Gunning Fog Index (FOG). Developed by Robert Gunning in 1952, this readability formula focuses on sentence length and word complexity to help you write clearer, more accessible content.

Understanding the Gunning Fog Index

What is the Gunning Fog Index?

The Gunning Fog Index is a powerful readability formula designed to help writers communicate more effectively. Developed by Robert Gunning in 1952, it emerged from a critical observation: many high school graduates struggled with reading not because of their abilities, but because business and technical writing was unnecessarily complex.

Unlike earlier readability formulas that were too complicated for practical use, Gunning created a straightforward tool that focuses on two key factors: sentence length and word complexity. The formula yields a number corresponding to the years of formal education needed to understand a text on first reading.

Origins and Development

In 1944, readability tools were largely unknown outside academic circles. Gunning, who had spent years in textbook publishing, recognized that newspapers and business documents often contained unnecessary "fog" - complex language that obscured meaning. This insight led him to establish the first readability consulting firm in 1944, where he worked with over 60 major newspapers and magazines to improve their writing clarity.

The Fog Index was refined through extensive real-world testing, focusing on elements that most affect reader comprehension. Gunning's approach was revolutionary: instead of creating another academic tool, he developed a practical formula that writers could use to assess and improve their work immediately.

Key Features

The Gunning Fog Index stands out for several reasons:

  • Simple measurement focused on sentence length and word complexity
  • Clear grade-level scoring that directly indicates reading difficulty
  • Practical application for both writers and editors
  • Equal effectiveness for technical and general content

Modern Applications

Today, the Fog Index remains a vital tool across various fields. Technical writers use it to ensure documentation is accessible, journalists employ it to maintain clear communication, and businesses rely on it to create effective customer communications. Its enduring relevance stems from a fundamental truth: clarity in writing is essential for effective communication.

Importantly, Gunning emphasized that the index should be used as a diagnostic tool, not a formula for writing. It helps identify potential clarity issues but should never override good judgment or creative expression. The goal is to make writing more accessible without making it simplistic.

The Gunning Fog Formula Explained

Gunning Fog Index (FOG) Formula
FOG = 0.4 × [(words/sentences) + 100 × (complex words/words)]
0.4
Scaling factor that aligns the score with U.S. grade levels
words/sentences
Average sentence length
complex words/words
Proportion of words with 3+ syllables

Understanding the Components

The Gunning Fog formula combines two key measurements to determine reading difficulty. Let's break down each component:

Scaling Factor (0.4)

The multiplication by 0.4 calibrates the final score to correspond with U.S. grade levels. This factor was determined through extensive research with the McCall-Crabbs reading tests, ensuring the formula's output aligns with actual reading comprehension levels.

Average Sentence Length (words/sentences)

Calculate this by dividing the total number of words by the number of sentences. This measures sentence complexity, with longer sentences generally indicating more sophisticated writing. Important note: semicolons and colons create compound sentences that should be counted as separate sentences.

Complex Word Percentage (100 × complex words/words)

Count words with three or more syllables, excluding: proper nouns (like "Washington"), familiar compound words (like "bookkeeper"), and words made three syllables by adding -ed or -es (like "created" or "trespasses"). Divide this count by total words and multiply by 100 to get the percentage of complex words.

Important Calculation Notes

  • For long texts, take several 100-word samples spaced evenly through the text
  • For shorter texts, analyze the entire passage as one sample
  • Proper nouns are excluded from hard word counts regardless of syllable count
  • Semicolons and colons create compound sentences that should be counted as separate sentences

Quick Example

Let's analyze this passage about urban gardening:

"Urban gardening transforms ordinary city spaces into vibrant green sanctuaries, creating opportunities for sustainable living in metropolitan areas. Dedicated enthusiasts cultivate vegetables and flowers in small balconies, rooftops, and community plots, establishing local food sources for their neighborhoods. Many apartment dwellers start with simple herbs in window boxes, gradually expanding their gardens as they gain experience and confidence. These urban oases not only provide fresh produce but also help reduce environmental impact by decreasing food transportation needs. Local communities often organize workshops to teach fundamental gardening techniques to beginners, fostering a collaborative atmosphere that strengthens neighborhood connections. Additionally, these gardens serve as educational spaces for children to learn about sustainable practices."
  • Total words: 111
  • Number of sentences: 6
  • Average sentence length: 18.5 words
  • Complex words: ordinary, sustainable, metropolitan, enthusiasts, cultivate, community, neighborhoods, apartment, gradually, experience, confidence, environmental, transportation, organize, fundamental, beginners, collaborative, atmosphere, neighborhood, connections, additionally, educational, sustainable (23 words)
  • Complex word percentage: (23/111) × 100 = 20.72%
  • Final calculation: 0.4 × (18.5 + 20.72) = 15.69

This passage scores at approximately a college junior level (15.69), primarily due to its high percentage of complex words. While the sentence length is moderate, the frequent use of multisyllabic words increases the overall complexity, making it more suitable for an advanced academic audience.

FOG Grade Level Scale

The Gunning Fog Index directly corresponds to the U.S. education grade level required to comprehend the text. Here's a comprehensive breakdown of scores and their interpretations.

FOG ScoreGrade LevelReader Age
17College graduate22+
16College senior21-22
15College junior20-21
14College sophomore19-20
13College freshman18-19
12High school senior17-18
11High school junior16-17
10High school sophomore15-16
9High school freshman14-15
8Eighth grade13-14
7Seventh grade12-13
6Sixth grade11-12

Interpreting FOG Scores

The ideal Fog Index score depends entirely on your target audience. While lower scores generally indicate better readability, some content requires higher complexity. Here's a practical guide for different types of content:

General Audience Content

Aim for scores between 7-8 (7th-8th grade level). This range is accessible to most readers while maintaining professional credibility. Most popular magazines and newspapers target this level.

Business Communications

Keep scores between 10-12 for business documents. This range ensures professionalism while maintaining clarity. Anything higher risks reducing comprehension and engagement.

Technical Documentation

Scores between 10-14 are acceptable, reflecting the complex nature of technical subjects. However, strive to break down complex ideas into clearer explanations when possible.

Academic Writing

Scores of 15-17 are common and often necessary, reflecting the sophisticated concepts and vocabulary required for academic journals and advanced research papers.

📝 Pro Tip

When in doubt, remember Gunning's advice: the average adult reader is comfortable at around the 8th-grade level (FOG score of 8). Unless your content specifically requires higher complexity, aiming for this level ensures maximum accessibility while maintaining professional standards.

Gunning Fog Index vs other readability metrics

While several readability formulas exist, each offers unique advantages for specific use cases. Here's how the Gunning Fog Index compares to other popular metrics:

ARI

Automated Readability Index

Uses character count instead of syllables. While ARI focuses on raw character counts, Gunning Fog specifically identifies complex words, making it more intuitive for writers to understand which specific words might be making their text difficult.

FK

Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level

Counts all syllables, while Gunning Fog focuses specifically on words with three or more syllables. This targeted approach helps writers identify particularly challenging vocabulary that might affect readability, rather than analyzing every word's complexity.

DC

Dale-Chall

Uses a predefined list of "easy" words, while Gunning Fog uses syllable count with specific exceptions. This makes Fog more flexible and easier to apply across different fields, as it doesn't require maintaining or referencing a word list.

SM

SMOG Index

Requires a minimum of 30 sentences and counts polysyllabic words. Gunning Fog can provide reliable results with shorter texts and includes important exceptions for common polysyllabic words, making it more practical for everyday use.

Key Advantages of Gunning Fog

  • Practical focus on identifying specific challenging words
  • Built-in exceptions for common polysyllabic words
  • Direct correlation with U.S. grade levels
  • Easy to apply manually or with automated tools

Tips to Improve Your FOG Score

Word Choice

  • • Replace complex words with simpler alternatives when possible
  • • Be mindful of words with three or more syllables
  • • Use technical terms only when necessary
  • • Choose familiar words over obscure ones

Sentence Structure

  • • Keep most sentences under 20 words
  • • Break compound sentences into simpler ones
  • • Vary sentence length for better flow
  • • Use precise punctuation to clarify meaning

Organization

  • • Start with key information
  • • Use clear paragraph breaks
  • • Include descriptive headings
  • • Break complex lists into bullet points

Review Process

  • • Read your text aloud to catch complexity
  • • Check FOG score throughout writing
  • • Get feedback from target audience
  • • Review specifically for three-syllable words

Important Note: As Gunning himself emphasized, this formula should guide your writing, not control it. The goal is clear communication, not artificially simple text. Sometimes a complex word or longer sentence is exactly what you need - just make sure it serves your purpose and your audience.

Ready to Analyze Your Text?

Get instant readability insights with Gorby's text analysis tools.

Try our text analyzer to see all readability scores, including Gunning Fog Index, in one place. Check word counts, readability metrics, and improve your writing instantly.

More Readability Tools

All Readability Metrics

Overview of all readability formulas and tools

View overview →

Automated Readability Index (ARI)

Calculate grade level based on character count

Learn more →

Coleman-Liau Index

Analyze text complexity using characters per word

Learn more →

Dale-Chall Readability

Evaluate readability using word familiarity

Learn more →

Flesch Reading Ease

Measure text readability on a 100-point scale

Learn more →

Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level

Convert text complexity to U.S. grade levels

Learn more →

SMOG Index

Assess readability based on polysyllabic words

Learn more →

Spache Readability Formula

Evaluate early reading materials using familiar word lists

Learn more →

© 2025 Gorby. All rights reserved.